« A Documentary | Main | Great Swedish Documentary on the history of Linux »

The Creepy Misogyny of NYT Restaurant Critic Frank Bruni

Today's NYT features a review by "Frank Bruni" of the restaurant at the Penthouse Executive club entitled: "Where Only the Salad Is Properly Dressed." He claims to like the steak there, but the entire article is a platform for his sexist comedic stylings, such as lines like this:

The men who actually wait on the tables are less attentive and personable than the women who hover around them (and, it should be noted, vanish quickly if shooed away). The prices of some dishes, pumped up to reflect the entertainment on hand, might also be called topless.

And this:

Meet Foxy. When I visited Robert’s on Valentine’s Day in a mixed-gender group (not all that unusual at the restaurant), she approached our table to hawk neck and shoulder massages, also $20 apiece.
“Foxy,” I began, then stopped myself, wondering if I was being too familiar. “Are you and I on a first-name basis, or should I address you as Ms. Foxy?”
“You can call me Dr. Foxy,” she said.
“Is that an M.D. or a Ph.D.?”
“Yes,” she answered.
The doctor coated her hands with moisturizer and, less seductively, antibacterial gel. She knows how to make a guy feel special.
The guy in question was one of my companions, whose collar she had already spread so she could get at his skin. She told us that she used to work at Scores, a disclosure that raised an interesting question. Is there a strip club arc of professional advancement, with the Hooters overachievers graduating to Scores and the Scores valedictorians to the Penthouse Executive Club?
And what’s after that? A cameo on Howard Stern’s show?

But it was in captioning the accompanying photographic slide show entitled "Two Kinds of Flesh" that Bruni reveals his true opinion of women who work at the restaurant. Here are a few examples:

pentstart.jpg
Bruni caption: "SHE NEEDS A STEAK . . . OR A SWEATER A dancer at the Penthouse Executive Club."

pent4.jpg
Bruni caption: "Here's the possibly perfect meal at Robert's: a porterhouse, rare or medium-rare by the looks of it, with the fat, crunchy onion rings. Look at that meat. On the plate, I mean. You can see how nicely charred it is on the outside, how soft and red within. It takes an impressive steak to rivet a photographer's attention from the scene to the cuisine. This one succeeded."

pent6.jpg
Bruni caption: "What I really want to do is direct."

pent9.jpg
Bruni caption: "A scene from the Penthouse Executive Club, a casting call for the sequel to "Showgirls" or Britney's latest night on the town? You decide."

Yet another reason to be a vegetarian.

Comments

um, you do realize that Bruni doesn't write the captions for slide shows don't you? this is the NY Times, that kind of stuff is below him.

second, I take it you missed the whole point of the review...it was his "coming out"...he's gay and that's the undercurrent throughout the review.

the sophomoric captions would have passed the scrutiny of Pete Wells, the Dining Section editor, not Bruni.

Not that this undermines your claim of misogyny, nor that this makes the silly article any more relevant or justifiable, but Frank Bruni is widely known to be openly gay. So I read it as a campy play on stuff straight guys consider "appetizing."

Well, if he hadn't spent so much of the article mocking the women so derisively, and devoted more energy to mocking the Penthouse Club or the other men eating there, maybe that would be a reasonable take I guess. The women = meat trope is seriously on my nerves these days...

Maybe some of the misogyny in hip hop is just campiness as well.

I remember Bruni writing on politics...and he had the front page article about how the newspaper consortium had conducted a recount and their results. The article said that Gore would have won any way you counted it...except one sort of oblique way...but the headline of the article said "Bush Would Have Won if all Votes Were Counted" ...or something to that effect. In other words, the headline which everyone reads completely contradicted the content of the article (which way fewer people read.) That's when I wondered who wrote that and didn't mind their article being subverted like that. Frank Bruni.

Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)


Remember me?