BMG Music v. Gonzalez
BMG Music v. Gonzalez was a copyright infringement case brought against a women who downloaded music. Eric Goldman has an overview here, and Mike Madison has one here. I read the decision as "Easterbrook thinks the Sony Betamax case is dead." Consider this passage:
"Gonzalez was not engaged in a nonprofit use; she downloaded (and kept) whole copyrighted songs (for which, as with poetry, copying of more than a couplet or two is deemed excessive); and she did this despite the fact that these works often are sold per song as well as per album."
Gonzales didn't make copies of the songs for sale or distribution, she just downloaded them so that she could listen to them, but according to Easterbrook, this is not "nonprofit." Recording movies or television shows for home use wouldn't be either, then, especially now that many movies and television shows are "for sale" either as they are broadcast (e.g. pay-per-view), or on DVD. It's hard to think of any "full text" copying that Easterbrook would find noncommerical. And even though the Supreme Court's opinion in Campbell v. Acuff Rose explicitly disavowed the purported principle that unauthorized commercial uses are presumptively unfair, it seems to be alive and well in Easterbrook's jurisprudence.