« Toyota Advertises Air Conditioning | Main | Protesting Sexism »

Important Article about the Global Knowledge Economy

Who Owns the Knowledge Economy?
Political Organising Behind TRIPS


by Peter Drahos with John Braithwaite

first published September 2004

Contents

Acknowledgements

Introduction

Global Knowledge Cartels

Box 1: Chemical and Pharmaceutical Patents and Cartels

The Changing Knowledge Game

Box 2: Corporate Laboratories of Knowledge

Changing Strategies

Changing Places For Deciding Rules

"Stealing from the Mind"

Box 3: Intellectual Property History

Protectionism

Getting US Government On Board

Power Through Committees

The Bilaterals: Carrots and Sticks

The Bilaterals: Big Stick Section 301

Global Surveillance

Box 4: Guesstimating Losses to "Piracy"

An Eye to Multilateral Action

Persuading Europe and Japan

Box 5: Re-engineering Patent Law

Living?

Inventive?

Useful?

Getting Intellectual Property on the Negotiating Table

Box 6: Intellectual Property Webs in Biotechnology

Patent Challenges

Persuasion and Principles

Negotiating Circles

At the Negotiating Table

The Puzzle of TRIPS

Other Answers to the Puzzle

The Visions of a Few

Box 7: The University-Industrial Knowledge Complex

The Public Pays

Uniting in Resistance

Notes and References

TRIPS -- the World Trade Organisation's agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights -- was the most important agreement on intellectual property of the 20th century. It revolutionised the way that property rights in information were defined and enforced. TRIPS effectively globalises the set of intellectual property principles it contains, because most countries are members of, or are seeking membership of, the World Trade Organisation that administers TRIPS.

When TRIPS was signed by more than one hundred government ministers in April 1994, the United States, the European Community and Japan had the world's dominant software, pharmaceutical, chemical and entertainment industries between them and the world's most important trade marks. The rest of the world had nothing much to gain by agreeing to terms of trade for intellectual property that offered these countries so much protection. Why did states sign up to TRIPS?

They did so because of a failure of democratic processes, both nationally and internationally. This enabled a small group of men within the United States to capture the US trade-agenda-setting process; then, in partnership with European and Japanese multinationals, to draft intellectual property principles that became the blueprint for TRIPS. The resistance of other countries was crushed through US trade power.

This briefing paper explores the background to TRIPS and the corporate political organising that orchestrated and paved the way for the agreement.

Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)


Remember me?