« How Much Time Do You Spend Watching YouTube? | Main | Academia Feels Like This Sometimes »

Pornography, Coercion, and Copyright Law 2.0

Abstract:
The lack of regulation of the production of pornography in the United States leaves pornography performers exposed to substantial risks. Producers of pornography typically respond to attempts to regulate pornography as infringements upon free speech. At the same time, large corporations involved in the production and sale of pornography rely on copyright law's complex regulatory framework to protect their pornographic content from copying and unauthorized distribution. Web 2.0 also facilitates the production and distribution of pornography by individuals. These user-generators produce their own pornography, often looking to monetize their productions themselves via advertising revenues and subscription models. Much like their corporate counterparts, these user-generators may increasingly rely on copyright law to protect their creations in the future.

While legal scholars have addressed the copyright law's role in incentivizing the creation and consumption of creative content in general, its effect on the creation and consumption of pornography has largely been ignored. Since pornography performers are at risk of abuse by the creators of pornography, particularly those that are filmed or photographed unknowingly or those who have sexual images of themselves distributed against their wishes, it is important consider what approaches there may be to reduce that risk, including the possibility of altering the copyright framework with respect to pornography.

Copyright laws do not provide ownership interests or control mechanisms to the subjects of pornographic material, and instead permits the creators to benefit at the expense of the subjects when their participation has not been consensual. Providing this type of control¿namely by requiring the creator to show that the subjects' participation was voluntary as a condition of providing copyright protection¿would help reduce the risks faced by pornography performers. Promulgating a moral approach to structuring copyright protections is already one goal that is animating calls for reform of the current system. Copyright law should link the ability to register and enforce copyrights on pornographic works to the creators' compliance with a regulatory scheme designed to promote the safety and well-being of pornographic performers by confirming their consent.

DOWNLOADABLE HERE.

Comments

Linking registry to compliance with statute should be fine with those that do not seek to thwart human rights or have anything to hide.

Outside of the War on Drugs and the War of Terror I believe that the greatest threat to liberty is Copyright as it is currently constructed and enforced. It's not the threat to the 1st Amendment that I worry about but the threat to the 4th that the DMCA, the NET Act, the soon to be enacted Pro IP Act and other copyright enforcement provisions chip away at. This idea would be just one more step along that way. What enforcement mechanism will be used to insure compliance? Who will the enforcers pursue; the producers or consumers of said product? Will the enforcement mechanism be abused by the poweres that be to further other objectives?

Then there is the Constitutional issue. I am not sure how you can square a provision like this with promoting the progress of science and the useful arts. A better question is how does pornography fit the definition of a useful art worthy of protection in the first place.


The "Lori" episode is interesting. To me, what that episode says is tha tthe sex industry deserves better legal recognition and regulation. A better solution would be a mandatory cooling off period after a sex worker signs a contract to perform and/or a cooling off period after the performance is completed before distribution. Cooling off periods are used in the states for different types of contracts. This sort of opt out could be enforced by the states and local courts and would require tinkering with copyright and the intrusiveness that such tinkering has created in our times.

Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)


Remember me?