« Hillary Clinton's Trademark Troubles | Main | The Human Knowledge Project, Part 1: My Henderson Lecture at UNC-Chapel Hill »

Attacks on Obama part of an old pattern

Newsday.com:

Clinton veering close to stereotypes
Attacks on Obama evoke the old biases - in pop culture and in politics - that black men are slick and lazy

BY CHARLTON McILWAIN

Charlton McIlwain is assistant professor of culture and communication at The Steinhardt School of Culture, Education and Human Development at New York University.

February 25, 2008

Many suspected that Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton's recent substance-over-mere-words attacks against Sen. Barack Obama smacked of desperation. Some expected these attacks to come to an end once Wisconsin had come and gone, giving the Clinton campaign its expected defeat there. But the fact that Clinton continues to repeat the substance-over-mere-words theme indicates that it may be the last card she has to play.

In her speech following the Wisconsin results, Clinton articulated several contrasts between herself and Obama. The first was a contrast of style versus substance, speeches versus action. With this alleged contrast, she comes dangerously close to the line of evoking a long-standing stereotype about black men: that they are "slick."

The stereotype has a history, especially tied to black men who deal in the currency of words. The idea is that they dazzle the soft-minded with a persuasive prose, but leave them with nothing more than a feeling, at best. At worst, the charm in their speech leaves unwitting audiences with something quite different from what they were promised. ...

Comments

I guess that Charlton McIlwain was just a fat ignorant redneck. If the black man is such a lazy individual, why was there ever such a thing called slavery? I think that the history books speak for themselves to find what race thinks that it is superior and blames others for their short comings.

[Editor's note: McIlwain not fat, ignorant, nor a redneck. He is a fit, overeducated, African American. And if you had actually understood his column you would have found that he is arguing just the opposite of what you think he is arguing. --- Siva ]

Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)


Remember me?