SIVACRACY.NET

Here is one of my recent papers, which will appear in a book later this year.

Nanotechnology and the Law of Patents: A Collision Course In Geoffrey Hunt and Michael Mehta, eds., Nanotechnology and Society: A Multidisciplinary Evaluation (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, forthcoming)

Abstract:

In the ill-defined world of “nanotechnology,” a simple sphericule or rod of carbon – the “buckyball” or “nanotube” has been patented not once, but more than 250 times in slightly different forms.1 The dream of nanotechnology – engineering substances at the scale of one nanometer -- reveals many of the dangers of an overprotective patent system. Paradoxically, an overprotective patent system threatens the potential benefits of a fully realized nanotechnology industry. The patent system is supposed to generate a limited monopoly for a specific invention so that the patent holder may extract monopoly rents for a limited time. But by its very nature, nanotechnology complicates the assumptions that underlie the principles of patenting inventions. Nanotechnology bridges the conceptual gaps between substance and information, hardware and software, and technology and science.